Case
of the K’s
Mike
Trout is easily the best player in baseball and not many people will argue that
fact. His speed, glove, bat and athleticism
just make him the total package when it comes to baseball players. He’s also only 23 years old making him
on the rise of his career and he could only get better. So what’s wrong with him this
year? Well to get a better look we
need to look at the numbers and see what exactly has changed on his approach at
the plate.
The
first place to look is just his overall stats; lets see if there is any real
outstanding issues other than just the K’s.
Slash Line:
|
BB%
|
K%
|
AVG
|
OBP
|
SLG
|
OPS
|
BABIP
|
ISO
|
wOBA
|
wRC+
|
2014
|
11.8%
|
27.6%
|
.272
|
.359
|
.524
|
.883
|
.347
|
.252
|
.380
|
146
|
2013
|
9.0%
|
18.5%
|
.283
|
.348
|
.503
|
.851
|
.320
|
.220
|
.367
|
137
|
Career
|
12.4%
|
21.2%
|
.310
|
.399
|
.542
|
.941
|
.365
|
.232
|
.403
|
162
|
What
I’ve done is taken the stats from this year and matched the date to show what
Trout had done up to this point last season, the career numbers are just to
give you a reference what his career totals are. So looking at the numbers the first thing we’ll notice is
Trout is doing better this year than he was last season in the same time frame
across the board. Wait? Hasn’t every sports station been saying
how bad Trout is doing? How his K%
is the highest in his career and he’s struggling? Yes, I thought that too and in fact only 2 stats are worse
than last year: BA and K%. Even
his BB%, which has been a major concern to so many, is UP from last year in the
same time frame.
So
what can we take away from this first look at the stats? Trout isn’t doing nearly as badly as
people think he is, even on the team he’s on his wRC+ puts him 46% better than
average so he’s not hurting anyone.
While his overall stats obviously are lower than his career what we’re
seeing in the chart is that his pace is actually BETTER than last years. While everything is down career wise it
doesn’t mean he’ll continue to be under the averages so lets take a look the
quality of the contact.
Batted Ball:
|
GB/FB
|
LD%
|
GB%
|
FB%
|
HR/FB
|
2014
|
0.95
|
17.6%
|
40.2%
|
42.2%
|
16.3%
|
2013
|
1.66
|
21.1%
|
49.2%
|
29.7%
|
15.8%
|
Career
|
1.19
|
22.1%
|
42.3%
|
35.6%
|
18.0%
|
So
here we do see something that is much different that normal. One of Trout’s best tools is his speed
and this actually can account for the lower BABIP. Players that are faster tend to have a higher BABIP since
they can force plays or rush the defender or even just beat a throw out. Trout is hitting almost 20% more balls
into the air where his speed has no advantage and adds no pressure to the
defense. Yes his HR/FB is
technically higher but when your hitting double the amount of FB then it’s not
really as big of a plus. The most
concerning thing to me is the decline in LD% and GB%; as I said one of his
better tools is his speed and Trout’s ability to hit to the gaps and allow his
speed to stretch that single into a double or triple, or just to steal bases in
general. Trout is getting under
the ball and lifting more than normal and if he gets the ball to flatten out
more then we could see that BABIP and in turn his BA go back to normal. So we know he’s getting under the ball
but lets take a look at what pitches he’s swinging at.
Swing Rate:
|
O-Swing
|
Z-Swing
|
Swing
|
O-Contact
|
Z-Contact
|
Contact
|
F-Strike
%
|
SwStr%
|
2014
|
26.0%
|
58.6%
|
41.0%
|
68.0%
|
88.1%
|
81.7%
|
55.9%
|
8.3%
|
2013
|
29.3%
|
53.4%
|
40.6%
|
59.4%
|
93.6%
|
80.5%
|
52.3%
|
7.7%
|
Career
|
25.8%
|
55.4%
|
39.2%
|
70.2%
|
88.1%
|
81.7%
|
55.4%
|
6.9%
|
Here
we see some interesting differences as well. This year he’s making more contact outside the zone by a
fair amount but is swing less, could be he’s not being fooled by many of the
pitches outside the zone. There
are 2 stats that strike me as odd: Z-Contact% and F-Strike% (First pitch
Strike%). He’s making his career
totals of contact but it is far less contact than last years pace so that is
something that I don’t like. As
for the F-Strike% its 3% higher than last year and it does give credit to the
higher K% since he’s in the hole more.
What gives more credit is the 1.3% higher than career Swinging Strike
Percent (SwStr%) and that is on the rise.
Adding the increased F-Strike% and SwStr% together could indicate that
he’s putting himself in the hole often and early.
Hot and Cold Chart:
0-1
|
0-3
|
.000
|
.000
|
0-1
|
1-3
|
.375
|
.400
|
.125
|
.091
|
.400
|
.294
|
.500
|
.214
|
.286
|
0-3
|
0-3
|
.222
|
2-4
|
|
So
we can see something quite interesting, Trout can’t turn on the ball right
now. Pitchers are challenging him
inside and winning the battle quite easily from what the numbers say. Worse than that is the pitch he
struggles the most against inside is the fastball, of all pitches the
fastball. This isn’t a good sign
for him but it isn’t a damning one either. Trout is getting ahead of himself and swinging early,
pitchers are now challenging him inside and he can’t fight it off and since
he’s lifting the ball more what contact he’s making is very soft. The pitchers are also noticing this;
you can see that the top of the strike zone is full of .000 BA, which supports
the rise in the FB%.
I
found it so odd how people keep focusing on the K% and lower BA; in fact that’s
what I expected to see. When I
noticed that there was more to it than just a rise in K’s I was a little taken
aback. The data supports that
Trout is struggling with more than just K’s; the rise in FB% and his struggles
against the fastball mixed with the Hot/Cold chart data makes for a compelling
argument. Now the good news, this
doesn’t seem like a hard fix for someone of Trout’s skill level. The one thing he needs to do is to get
back to that level of patients that allowed him to get better pitches. The fact he isn’t fairing well on the
inside can also be worked on, in the end Trout is the best player in baseball
for a reason and I trust him to make the adjustments he needs to.
No comments:
Post a Comment